It is virtually impossible to maintain data integrity in computerized election systems! We have no assurance that:
Texans cannot be assured of equal representation in voting - based upon voter specific data published by the Texas SOS, which is absent of
Given the data integrity issues identified at the macro and micro level in the Texas SOS’ own reporting systems, it is not possible that any rational person could believe that the county election systems which feed the SOS election results are reliable or accurate. This statement applies to most counties, election systems and vendors across this state.
With no official finality in the list of voters who “voted” in a Texas election due to continual revisions to the vote rosters (voter checkin records) during an election and months after an election has been canvassed* and certified, Texans should demand that those elections should be de-certified. *Canvass = ballots tabulated & election outcome determined.
Said another way: If the SOS cannot determine who voted in an election, there is no way to determine that the ballots cast in that election are representative of the actual intent of the voter.
Only those elections that have an exact one-to-one relationship between a vote roster entry (check in record) and a legally voted ballot can be certified. Without this permanent relationship, the ballots cast by the individuals listed in the vote roster and then with the voter later removed makes the ballots invalid. They must not be counted, but this procedural safeguard is logistically impossible when the ballots are separated from the voter.
Texans deserve transparent, honest elections. We must demand that we change the way we do elections in Texas! Stay tuned for solutions and implementation strategies.
Jordanian Report on SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.
Documented research papers, patents, and funding sources clearly demonstrate that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus # 2 (SARS-CoV-2) associated with the development of Corona Virus Disease first presenting in 2019 (CoViD-19) is the result of Gain-of-Function research with a less than 1 in 3-Trillion probability of the virus having occurred naturally without human intervention.
The resulting nucleotide base sequences have resulted in two significant problems that require separate attention and understanding.
I. The spike protein.
Within the spike protein proper are two regions of concern due to their specific capacity to cause prion diseases. The first is the HIV gp120 insertion first reported by Shi Zhengli as she attempted to increase viral infectivity through alteration of the HKU4 spike protein. HIV gp 120 is a well-established prion that is known to produce neurologic damage by inducing changes in proneurotrophin pro-brain-derived neurotrophic factor (proBDNF). This gp120 attachment is significant as it establishes cellular attachment of the virus via Neu5AC binding. This binding results in the virus being brought into apposition with the ACE2 receptor, initiating a series of receptor site activation through TMPRSS2, the furin (PRRA) cleavage site and finally neuropilin-1; the later being critical for activation of neurologic InflammoThrombotic Response (ITR).
The second prion site within the spike protein complex occurs near the regional binding domain responsible for attachment of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptor and is the result of alterations to the three-dimensional structure of the spike protein. These alterations follow from insertions of the PRRA (proline-arginine-arginine-alanine) and various HIV (human) and SIV (simian) inserts as well documented by Professor Luc Montagnier and colleagues.
Documented changes in proteins with resulting prion diseases in both humanized mice and rhesus macaques have demonstrated spongiform encephalopathy (aka mad cow disease) and Alzheimer’s disease. Such prion diseases are also well documented in cardiac and other disease states including the development of Amyloidosis.
II. The InflammoThrombotic Response (ITR).
Above and beyond the fundamental concerns of the spike protein remains the fundamental problems associated with the induction of the InflammoThrombotic Response (ITR) resulting from either poorly regulated or unregulated immunologic response to a variety of factors; including but not limited to infectious agents. This theory was first presented and established by myself in 1994 at the American Heart Association meetings.
Briefly explained, the attachment and replication of a virus such as SARS-CoV-2 induces immunologic responses through both major histocompatibility complexes I and II (MHC I; MHC II). Following activation of these complexes a series of cytokines, interleukins, growth factors, tissue necrosis factors, thrombotic factors. The result of these factors briefly shown in the following figure is the biochemical pathways that under proper control and regulation with both destroy infected cells and limit blood flow into and out of an infected region/tissue.
This inflammation and blood clotting (thrombosis) under normal circumstances effectively control spread of an infectious agent throughout the body, while starving off the infectious agent by depriving it of nutrients and preventing it’s spread.
However, in circumstances where the person is already experiencing ITR diseases; including but not limited to coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, tumors, cerebral vascular disease, et cetera, the addition of yet another series of ITRs can produce an uncontrolled response yielding tissue wide damage. With SARS-CoV- 2, this can been seen as myocardial and pericardial diseases, hepatic and renal disease, cerebral vascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, testicular and ovarian disease, gastrointestinal disease, respiratory disease including but not limited to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), et cetera.
Early in the course of disease transmission, these comorbid ITR diseases were associated with increased deaths due to a failure to address the ITR. Consequently, major organ system failure was seen followed by death.
With the introduction of the drug vaccine biologics (DVBs; vaccines), encoding the SARS- CoV-2 Wuhan Hu-1 spike protein, injected individuals were not exposed to hundreds to thousands of viral particles following translation of the mRNA into spike proteins that are independently capable of eliciting the ITR; but rather, 13.1 billion following the use of the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA drug vaccine biologics, and 50 billion following the injection of Janssen and Astra Zeneca DNA drug vaccine biologics. This massive increase in the number of spike antigens being presented by MHC I and II produced an augmented ITR in individuals with competent immune systems responding to a significantly increased viral load. The ITR does not and has not required the presence of an entire virus to be activated and produce clinical complications.
In addition to the activated ITR following the DVBs, evaluation of immune response to the DVBs have demonstrated a blunting of interferon production, reduction in T-lymphocyte counts, reductions in T-helper 2 (Th2) cells critical for adaptive immune response and impairment in immune response to subsequent DVBs for influenza.
In addition to the above noted problems, the use of the DVBs focusing on the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan Hu-1 spike protein, has resulted in pressure selection of the virus producing variants now capable of escaping immunity to the original Wuhan Hu-1 spike protein. The consequence has been pressure selection yielding continued decline in potential vaccine benefit, while continuing to demonstrate augmented ITRs.
Theory of Inflammation in pictures: theory_of_inflammation_explained.pages
I am available to provide further explanation and discussion under Oath.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and is based upon published research and published patents. Executed on 9 March 2022.
Printed name: Richard M Fleming, PhD, MD, JD
On February 22, 2022, Dr. Richard M. Fleming addressed American Liberty Forum on the above topic. You can watch the video by clicking here. He made a lot of people mad because he dared to challenge the popular narratives and the popular personalities. I don't do popular and I don't tip toe through the tulips when so much is at stake. America is devolving into an unrecognizable country with little hope of returning to the good ol' days of pre-2019. Well, maybe they weren't so good after all, and maybe we really don't want to return. Nevertheless, we don't want to continue in this downward spiral of becoming a socialist/marxist, godless, nation of subjects obeying their masters (the elitist-globalists), losing our minds and our souls and the very essence of who we are. If we don't fight with the truth, they win and we lose. I dare you to watch the video. Pay attention to the caveat emptor (buyer beware) in my introductory remarks. Tell me where you think Dr. Fleming is mistaken.
With each passing day, I am more and more convinced that we have a lot more work to do to get ourselves an honest election for the 2020 Primary and beyond. I have a spoiler alert for those of you who are still wondering about SB1. The answer is “NO, this is NOT the best Election Law Ever”, contrary to the claims of Governor Abbott and other state legislators. I am telling you this at the beginning so you’ll know right up front where I’m heading with this blog post today. You can read my in-depth analysis of SB1 in the previous blog post dated 10/27/21. For now, I will focus on the biggest problem in our election system and what we must do to fix it.
First things first, I want to talk to you about the books in my home. These books are loaded with wonderful, valuable information, carefully authored and meticulously recorded. My books could last forever if stored properly and handled with care. I have hundreds and hundreds of books all over my house, and even though they take up a considerable amount of space, I think it's well worth it to have the information in these books at my finger tips. I can see the books, touch them, guard them, and read them anytime I want. In fact, I was willing to sacrifice space in my house for beautiful wall art so I could have those walls for more book cases to hold my books. You might be thinking “This lady is living in the stone-age? Hasn't she heard of ebooks?”.
Well, yes I have heard of ebooks. As I write this blog, I have sitting on my desk a brand new thumb drive, small enough to fit right in my pocket and big enough to contain the electronic versions of not only my books, but also all the books in the Library of Congress, and probably some of your books too! It's true that I could buy lots of ebooks and have convenient, quick and easy access to all of my books. Then I could have all of the books I wanted AND walls of beautiful art - all at the same time. I could have my cake and eat it too.
And THAT my friends is just the type of rationale that cost President D. Trump his re-election. Let me explain what I mean by that. And when I do, I think you will see why SB1 will not give us an honest election in our Primary next March.
In contrast to my ebooks, real books do take up a large amount of space and they can be cumbersome and more time consuming to manage and maintain and keep up to date. But, unlike an ebook where just a single key stroke can instantly delete forever any amount of information one chooses, it takes a lot more energy to destroy the information written down in the printed book. More importantly, once a real book is published, it's very difficult to alter the information printed on these pages.
However, this is not the case with my ebooks! On my ebook, with the right software, in a matter of seconds, I could search my entire library of ebooks for the word 'idiot' and have it instantly replaced with the name ‘Joe Biden’, and I could do this without eraser marks or white-out blotches - no torn paper or any other indication that my edit wasn't exactly what the author originally intended.
But of course, I’m not really wanting to write about ebooks and wall art. I want to write about something much more weighty: Stolen Elections and How To Stop Them From Happening Again.
Over the last 10 years or so, our county elections departments started implementing electronic voting systems for early voting and then shifted completely over to all electronics in 2019 and 2020. We went from a manual system of physical paper poll books, precinct only voting, on hand marked paper ballots, with manual tabulation and paper records of vote results —to— electronic poll books, electronic ballot markers with electronic tabulation and electronic storage of vote results. We digitized everything! This shift created a gaping security hole, where voter rolls, records of voter check ins, and vote results can be easily accessed, altered, or entirely deleted with little or no evidence of tampering - making stolen elections profoundly doable.
And when that happens, here’s what you get:
Are stolen elections consequential? You bet they are!
But did the electronics in the election process really get hacked and cost Trump and others their elections? Let’s look at some numbers that many of us have heard before but bear repeating to prove the point:
The real numbers point to a solid win for Trump.
On a more local level, I can speak to what happened in Dallas County:
I have so many examples of incontrovertible proof that voter rolls and voter check in records were manipulated and that vote results were changed, but at this point, I want to shift from looking back to looking forward.
SB1 was a terrible bill. As I stated previously, you can read the highlights of my analysis of SB1 in my 10/27/21 blog post.
SB1 is terrible, not because it only has a few nice tweaks here and there and not because of the many unintended consequences in the bill - like our poll watchers being much worse off in their ability to observe and report cheating.
No, SB1 was a terrible bill is because it does not address the monster in the other room, that is, the computers used in our election process.
So here’s where the rubber meets the road. We need to get ourselves a new bill. Not just one big omnibus bill, but lots of small bills addressing one by one the components needed to run an election without computers. The list of things that we need to have if we are going to get the computers out of the election process can be found at the end of this post.
The process for how we’re going to go about getting ourselves these new bills begins and ends with resolutions - starting at the bottom of the food chain. The resolutions we need will list exactly what has to happen in order to run an election without computers. A template for your resolutions is also at the bottom of this post.
To start the resolutions process, we need resolutions passed by the Executive Committee of Precinct Chairs for your County Party. Then we need the resolutions passed at the Precinct Convention, and likewise at the Senate District Convention, then finally at the State Convention so that our GOP Party Platform demands that we run our elections without computers.
Once the State GOP Party Platform makes honest elections a priority, then we fight like hell to get our state leadership and legislators to give us what “we the people” want in the next legislative session. This will be the hardest work you’ve ever done, but it will be a lot harder to suffer the consequences of stolen elections. So, let’s get to work! Write me at firstname.lastname@example.org if you want to help.
The Honest Elections List:
Resolution Template Calling for Honest Elections:
Whereas, SB1 does not address the major opportunities for fraud in our elections
Whereas, Transparency & access to equipment, procedures, and raw data (from Precinct, County, and SOS) are critical to honest elections;
Whereas, Audit-ability & Accountability (from Precinct, County, and SOS) are necessary for honest elections;
Whereas, Audit must be precisely defined;
Whereas, Recourse & Remedies by the Legislature and Judiciary must be available to the citizenry when elections are called into question;
Whereas, Meaningful Deterrents must be in the Penal Code;
Whereas, Legal Standing for registered voters, candidates, poll watchers must be granted;
Let It Be Resolved that the New Election Law Bills provide:
(write separate resolutions for each of the following:)
Avoiding A Loss Is Not A Win - SB1 Is Not A Win
Right off the bat, the alarm bells start ringing in my head when I read in Section 1.03 that “the legislature finds that: (6) providing for voter access and increasing the stability of a constitutional democracy ensures public confidence in the legitimacy of public officers chosen by election.” Neither confidence nor legitimacy can be found in our elections if our own lawmakers believe that we are a constitutional “democracy" and if they believe they can plug up enough holes in mail ballots, early voting, voter registration, and faux audits to overcome the major attack points in our computer-based electronic voting systems. Do we know who really owns the companies who sell us these electronic voting systems, who is on their boards, or what is in their lease agreements? Do we really know everything about the actual software code to ensure that no backdoors are open or that no options for ignoring duplicate votes or options for deleting selected batches of votes exist?
SB1 is a 76 page bill that assumes that our elected officials and the bureaucratic agency over elections will do the right thing. SB1 completely ignores the intrinsic vulnerability of electronic systems of any kind, especially voting systems. Major industries, large enterprises, large military and governmental institutions, and local municipalities all get hacked, even with their almost unlimited budgets, top tier personnel, their best and brightest at their beck and call to write so called “unhackable” software programs. If they can’t do it, then why should we expect Navarro County Elections Department to do it?
Not to be too pessimistic, let’s give credit where credit is due. Section 1.0015 is a good start: “It is the intent of the legislature that the application of this code and the conduct of elections be uniform and consistent throughout this state…” In previous years, the Secretary of State would issue waivers in some counties, but not others. Bravo for seeking to put everyone under the same procedures. If Section 1.0015 included criminal penalties for those who did not conduct elections uniformly and consistently throughout this state, it would be a real win.
Section 87.103 (a) is another possible win: “The early voting electronic system ballots counted at a central counting station, the ballots cast at precinct polling places, and the ballots voted by mail shall be tabulated separately [from the ballots cast at precinct polling places] and shall be separately reported on the returns. This provision adds another level of granularity to help candidates’ recounts or data analyses.
Section 4.15 addresses a massive amount of errors in the system logs where votes exceed ballots cast. In past elections, the election managers could simply select “use results” over and over. Making that more difficult should be accomplished in Section 4.15 (f) ”The presiding judge of the central counting station shall provide and attest to a written reconciliation of votes and voters at the close of tabulation for election day…” If you can trust the fox guarding the hen house, then kudos for another step in the right direction. Only time will tell.
Article 10.01 of SB1 repeals Section 127.201 (f) of the Election Code allowing the Secretary of State to waive “PARTIAL COUNT OF ELECTRONIC VOTING SYSTEM BALLOTS BY GENERAL CUSTODIAN”. Section 7.04 of SB1 amends Section 276 of the Election Code by adding Section 276.019 “A public official or election official may not create, alter, modify, waive, or suspend any election standard, practice, or procedure mandated by law or rule in a manner not expressly authorized by this code.” The glaring omission is that no criminal penalties are attached to these crimes. While the level of risk is increased to the wrong doer, the fear of punishment is not.
Senator Bob Hall gave us a victory by codifying into law a procedure that was required in many counties, including Dallas County, but not actually prescribed by the State Legislature: SECTION 3.06 amends Section 61.002 of the Election Code to require zero tapes and result tapes (election day only) to be printed: (a) Immediately before opening the polls for voting on the first day of early voting and on election day, the presiding election judge or alternate election judge shall confirm that each voting machine has any public counter reset to zero and shall print the tape that shows the counter was set to zero for each candidate or measure on the ballot. The biggest disappointment with this section is that it DOES NOT require vote results to be printed at the close of Early Voting. Add that to the 4 day gap between Early Voting and Election Day and we have been given a huge window of opportunity for electronic manipulation of vote results to take place undetected, with no paper trail for a forensic audit. We must demand that our legislature eliminate this gap!
Article 2 in SB1 makes an admirable attempt to clean up voter registration procedures and voter rolls, but it appears to be a lot of motion with little or no impact as long as the electronic computer vulnerabilities are not addressed. Furthermore, we must watch the Secretary of State’s rule making process to make sure this section does not get watered down. And we must be ever vigilant to look for stealth ways to manipulate the voter rolls.
In Section 3.03, “the secretary of state shall provide for an audit of the voting system equipment [direct recording electronic voting units] before and after the election, and during the election to the extent such an audit is practicable.” Nothing is practicable during the election, so don’t get your hopes up that an audit would take place. Allowing the Secretary of State (SOS) to select who does the audit, who is chosen to be audited and what are the terms of the audit is like two wolves and a duck deciding what’s the dinner!
Section 3 also provides for a register of spoiled ballots and the creation of a checklist for election judges, but many counties already had these tools. What’s new here?
Section 3.09 goes overboard in expanding hours and days for voting opportunities. Where is the data to show the necessity for these additions?
Section 3.13 (f-1) ”Notwithstanding any other provision of this section concerning the location of temporary branch polling places, in an election in which countywide polling places are used, the commissioners court of a county shall employ the same methodology it uses to determine the location of countywide polling places to determine the location of temporary branch polling places.” This section should be red flagged as a potential backdoor to legalize countywide voting. We want precinct only voting for better accountability and easier auditing. The county wide voting area was a top down decision, not resulting from an outcry of the citizenry. Temporary branch polling places are used to target a particular voting population with the intention of skewing the results of the races on the ballot. We see no legitimate need for temporary branch polling places.
Section 3.14 addresses changes in the composition of the Early Voting Ballot Board, reducing the extra board from 2 to 1, with the presiding judge getting to pick this 3rd member. What a nice way to ensure the tie goes to the Democrat presiding judge. (The party whose candidate wins in the gubernatorial race gets to choose the judges for early voting.)
Skipping a lot of pages in the bill, we find a potential win in Section 127.009, but the untrained computer novice can’t be too sure.
Sec.A127.009.AELECTRONIC DEVICES IN CENTRAL COUNTING STATION. (a) A counting station manager and the presiding judge of the counting station shall develop a protocol under which any electronic device inside a central counting station that is necessary to count votes is equipped with software that tracks all input and activity on the electronic device. Can this software be bypassed? Are the counting station managers and presiding judges qualified to develop a protocol to track input and other activity on the electronic devices? According the one cyber expert, this Section would be stronger if it included a requirement that the EMS server be imaged immediately after an election by an independent forensic agency and the image be kept for 22 months. Any software updates within the 22 month period would require a re-imaging.
Section 127.1232 requires video surveillance for counties with a population of 100,000 or more. Three stars for this provision, but shame on the legislators for taking away the provision in the original SB7 (from the Regular Session) that would have allowed poll watchers to video/record with their own device.
Speaking of poll watchers: some provisions strengthen the rights of poll watchers to actually watch, see, hear, and even trail a car if need be. Section 4.09 makes more specific the particular ways an offense can occur against a poll watcher, including making it a Class A misdemeanor to obstruct a watcher. But this win is a wash. The original SB7 made it a felony, the Democrats (or was it a Republican?) made it a Class B misdemeanor, but then it went back to it’s original level of Class A. Nothing gained; nothing lost. Avoiding a loss is not a win.
Another loss for the poll watcher comes in the form of a possible win for the candidate, should the candidate take advantage of this newly given standing. Not allowing the poll watcher to have standing is wrong on so many levels, but perhaps the candidate will take step up on the poll watchers’ behalf. Sec.A33.063.AARELIEF. The appointing authority for a watcher who believes that the watcher was unlawfully prevented or obstructed from the performance of the watcher’s duties may seek:
(1)AAinjunctive relief under Section 273.081, including issuance of temporary orders;
(2)AAa writ of mandamus under Section 161.009 or 273.061; and
(3)AAany other remedy available under law.
If the poll watcher is personally harmed, then the poll watcher should have standing to sue in court. Depending upon a candidate to take the time and the money to sue on behalf of their poll watcher is not fair to the poll watcher.
A major loss to the poll watcher is found in Sec.A33.008. “The secretary of state shall develop and maintain a training program for watchers.” Past experience leads one to believe that the SOS’ training program will do more to create fear of committing a crime while poll watching than to create boldness based on knowing the rights of the poll watchers. This provision is a major no-go.
The worst nightmare for a poll watcher is the new requirement to take an oath. Heretofore, poll watchers had no prescribed duties, so an oath would be inappropriate. Under Section 4.06 (h)A”Before accepting a watcher, the officer presented with a watcher’s certificate of appointment shall require the watcher to take the following oath, administered by the officer: ‘I swear (or affirm) that I will not disrupt the voting process or harass voters in the discharge of my duties.’ “ This oath creates a new opportunity for perjury, unless a second poll watcher were assigned to be an eye witness to protect the first. Doubling the manpower needs for poll watchers is out of the question. Asking them to take an oath is reprehensible. Who gets to decide that the watcher is “harassing” a voter? Or “disrupting" the process? The fox is guarding the hen house once again.
It appears that the Secretary of State has more regulatory authority over the poll watchers with this new bill and no penalties on themselves if they do not follow the law. Chapter 276 defines the crimes in the Election Code, but does not assign penalties to the SOS for committing the crimes. Was this negligence intentional or ignorance? Either way makes the legislators look bad.
Subchapter J. Randomized Audits is almost as bad as a previous bill referring to risk limiting audits. The complete absence of a thorough forensic audit is deafening; the convoluted limits on who gets audited is absurd, and the conflict of interest with the SOS making the rules about the audits is scary. See for yourself:
Sec.A127.351.ARANDOMIZED COUNTY AUDITS. (a)AImmediately after the uniform election date in November of an even-numbered year, the secretary of state shall conduct an audit of the elections held in four counties during the previous two years. (b)AAThe secretary of state shall select the counties to be audited under Subsection (a) at random, except that: (1) two of the counties selected must have a total population of less than 300,000; (2) two of the counties selected must have a total population of 300,000 or more; and (3) a county selected in the most recent audit cycle may not be selected in the current audit cycle. (c)AAA county selected to be audited may not pay the cost of performing an audit under this section. (d) The secretary of state shall adopt rules as necessary to implement this section.
Another major deficit in SB1 concerning audits is that SB1 does not prevent county election departments from signing contracts with election system vendors that disallow forensic audits or that allow their so-called “proprietary” software to be hidden from inspection. What is so proprietary about tallying votes? Are they protecting their fractional voting algorithms or their options to count duplicate batches and throw out selected batches?
Sec. 121.004 COMMUNICATIONS WITH VOTING SYSTEMS VENDOR
PUBLIC INFORMATION starts well, but ends badly. Go to (3) (b) ,highlighted in bold below, and ask yourself if this exception makes you feel better about our ability to audit our elections.
(a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), a written letter, e-mail, or other communication, including a communication made confidential by other law, between a public official and a voting systems vendor:
(1) is not confidential;
(2) is public information for purposes of Chapter 552, Government Code; and
(3) is not subject to an exception to disclosure provided by Chapter 552, Government Code, other than Sections 552.110 and 552.1101, Government Code.
(b) written letter, e-mail, or other communication between a public official and a voting systems vendor is excepted from disclosure under Chapter 552, Government Code, if the communication discloses information, data, or records relating to the security of elections critical infrastructure. This paragraph seems to be too much of an out clause, keeping everything confidential. The election system vendors have been hiding behind the “our software is proprietary, so you can’t see it”, so they will use letter (b) to prevent disclosure of any and all communications. Furthermore, letter (b) seems to be a direct contradiction to number (3).
Perhaps the most egregious failure in SB1 bill is the reduction of criminal penalties from a 2nd Degree Felony to a Class A Misdemeanor, Sec. 9.03, page 72-73, changing Election Code 64.012 for the following:
This change was done behind closed doors at the last minute with almost no one knowing about it. Was this amendment part of a deal with the Democrats? Are the Republicans so unconcerned about election integrity that they don’t want to deter people from cheating?
For a quick snapshot from yet another set of eyes, read the following reasons for concern about the future of our election process:
- Removes registered "voters" who claimed exclusion from jury duty due to being foreign nationals.
- Requires comparison of SOS and DPS citizenship records.
Sec. 4.14 Modifies Election Code 127.1301
- Bans use of storage devices in central count optical scanners.
Sec. 2.04 Unlawful voting
- Modified Election Code 15.028 Unlawful Voting
- Appears to specify no penalty
Sec. 3.03 Audit
- No definition of "audit".
- For example: Does the Vote Roster Count match the Ballot Count?
- Still refers to "ballot marking devices". No definition. Usually means computer printed "vote".
Sec. 3.09 Early Voting
- Early Voting should be eliminated. It allows cheaters time to figure out how many votes they need to adjust.
Sec. 3.17 Central Counting Computers
- What is described in clearly HACKABLE. This is a misleading disguise intended to present a favorable impression.
Sec. 3.18 Video cameras in central count
Again, this is very HACKABLE. Like a show vote.
Sec. 4.01 Watchers
- Poll watchers are only able to catch very small numbers of retail voting fraud. The smart guys will not be visible.
- The best way to prevent polling place fraud is:
- Require hand marked paper ballots and manually tabulated ballots with nothing more than a 4 function calculator.
- Confirm manual vote roster count equals the ballot count.
- Post vote rosters online.
- Post manual poll books online.
- Post polling location ballot count by race.
- Allow manual recount by precinct if requested.
Sec. 4.08 Modifies Sec.A33.0605. OBSERVING DATA STORAGE SEALING AND TRANSFER.
- The only data that should be transferred from the polls to central count is ballot count by race, the vote roster totals, and the actual hand marked paper ballots No flash drives.
Sec. 5.02 Modifies Election Code Sec. 84.002
-This is a huge loophole that allows foreign residents to request mail-in ballots.
- Mail-in ballots should only be allowed fo US Military, foreign stationed bureaucrats, and elderly who provide solid proof of their identity and some simple ability, (Do Alzheimer's patients have a constitutional right to vote. What prevents a "helper" from voting for a comatose patient?
Sec. 5.04 Mail-in Ballot Request
-The ban on 3rd parties is good, but the lack of a penalty is bad..
Sec. 5.08 Modifies Sec. 86.002, Election Code
- "No record associating an individual voter with a ballot may be created."
-The is NO technical means to separate the ballot from the voter's identity.
Sec. 5.11 Signature Verification
- Modifies Election Code Sec. 87.027
- No way this can be anything but a political slugfest.
-Solid verification is not possible.
-Mail-in ballots must be minimized.
Sec. 5.17 Modifies Election Code Sec. 87.103
-Early voting is a major fraud opportunity. The daily results give a hacker the information needed to just eeks out a win without causing too much suspicion to overshooting with the cheat.
Sec. 7.04 Vote Harvesting
- Modifies Election Code Sec.276.15.
-There are so many exceptions, this crime is almost impossible to prosecute.
"Residence" appears to still not be defined. (Dallas has thousands of "voting residents" who actually reside in foreign countries.) Only exceptions should be active duty servicemen and possibly civil service officers posted out of the country.
Now that SB1 is signed into law, we must get all eyes on the Secretary of State during the rule making process! Like a dog on a bone, we must show up for every SOS rule making meeting. We need to start now banging on Keith Ingram’s office to find out when the rule making starts, what is the notification procedure, how does the public get to add input (to get the rules we want). We must read every draft with a fine tooth comb. SOS rule making must not operate in the dark. The SOS must feel our intense scrutiny. Let’s become order givers, not order takers!
In my humble opinion, SB1 is a bill that was doomed from the beginning. We have reason to believe that our legislators were told not to address the problems with computers in our electronic voting system. Hence, SB1 does nothing to address the monster in the room and it only nibbles around the edges with a lot of motion and very little effect. As said before, the major attack vectors were not addressed. Legalese abounds while the Secretary of State gets to make the rules for what the implementation actually looks like. The lack of intense oversight coupled with insufficient forensic audits with complete access to equipment & software and limited penalties associated with crimes is jarring. Poll watchers’ risk levels go up while the Secretary of State’s risk level goes down. Implementation is always the wild card. All that glitters is not always gold. Proverbs 11:22 “Like a gold ring in a pig’s snout is a beautiful woman without discretion.” This proverb calls us to be discerning, looking beneath the exterior. Look beneath the glittering exterior of SB1’s 76 pages of smoke and mirrors. Keep fighting for what we need to secure our elections!
We asked the legislators to give us secure elections with:
-hand-marked paper ballots
-hand counted tabulation
-NO Computers, NO wireless capability even if it’s “turned off"
-limited EV, no gap with election day
-strict limits on mail ballots
-unlimited audit-ability and complete access to all equipment and processes
-numbering of ballots (it’s in the Texas Constitution)
-printed result tapes at the end of EV
-precinct only voting
-no waivers by the Secretary of State
We did not get any of these things in SB1. Some of the tweaks are nice, but we wouldn’t need any of those “tweaks” if we didn’t have computer- based election systems and if we could go back to hand counts of vote tallies. Some of the legislators’ attempts to guard mail ballots are nice, but they didn’t go nearly far enough. Ignoring Early Voting and the gap between it and Election Day is a devastating loss, as is failing to require numbered ballots. Even printing vote result tapes is a no-brainer! Bottom line, every computer and wifi network is remarkably hackable. What are our legislators thinking??
The pressure to take the vaccine is mounting. More and more people are caving simply because they are tired of the fight. They are tired of being shamed, ostracized, and treated differently because they refuse to take a vaccine. Don’t get me wrong. If you want to take the vaccine, it’s your choice. I respect your decision to take the vaccine. It’s your body and your choice. However, I also have to make a decision about what’s best for me and my body even if it means not taking the vaccine. For those of you who are tired of fighting, tired of the shaming, and tired of being singled out, don’t quit fighting. Stand strong because if you don’t the enemy will win. In times like these, I think about the words of Thomas Paine. During the revolutionary war, when things were getting tough, the troops were discouraged and 1000s deserted. Thomas Paine wrote these words:
“THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated.”
So what kind of soldier are you?
Are you the kind that only fights when it’s easy and the price is cheap? Or are you the kind that will fight against tyranny even when the going gets tough and the cost is high?
Written by L. Elizabeth Biesel
As Election Integrity Chair for Texas Eagle Forum and a member of the Texans for Election Integrity Team, I want to go on record about my thoughts on how the 87th Legislative Session, 2021 has gone for election reform.
Let me start right out of the gate by saying that I’m furious. Overall, the whole process of addressing election integrity has been an abject failure. The process, the delays, the politics, the unnecessary complexities, and the obvious unpreparedness on the part of the Republicans is more than disappointing. Here we are at the end of the session, and we don NOT have a single solid election reform bill passed.
Does it really take this long to do the right thing? What’s the hindrance? The Democrats or the Republicans? Just recently,
We tried to get computers out of the election process, but our pleas fell on deaf ears. At the beginning of the legislative session, we had 6 simple asks, well, 7 if you include our asking for Keith Ingram to be fired.
This list addresses the 6, well 7, major attack surfaces of voter fraud and electronic fraud in the most uncomplicated, direct way, and yet the majority of our state legislators have managed to monumentally fail in protecting the ballot by giving us convoluted, complex bill language that does not address wholesale election fraud through electronic ballot manipulation.
Given that cyber intrusions happen in all major sectors, including, financial institutions, large commercial enterprises, government and military facilities, why do we think it wouldn’t happen say in Navarro County Elections Department or Midland County or Montgomery County? One of my colleagues asked the question: “why would we let the horses out of the barn and then close the barn door.?” Said another way, why would we wait for it to happen in an election, and then try to fix it. Oh wait. Maybe it already happened in the 2020 Presidential. The question is not IF our election systems will be hacked, but WHEN and HOW MUCH DAMAGE will be done?
Unless and until we get the computers out of the election process, we will never have enough laws to protect us from wholesale election fraud. And we will never again have another chance to win enough seats to win liberty and conservative victories in any sector. (Life, education, tollroads, statues, gender, 2nd Amendment, etc.) With perfectly clean legitimate voter rolls, the strictest of strict mail ballot qualifications, limited EV, and zero waivers, we still cannot guarantee that our vote results are authentic and believable.
As an election judge, I can have the most perfectly run polling location, with only qualified voters voting. But I cannot guarantee that their vote selections are counted properly or that the flash drives that I turn in are read properly. Where is the outrage from our elected officials? In Early Voting, our vote result tapes are not printed, so no one can guarantee that the votes are counted properly because we have no audit paper trail. This is unacceptable.
With the loss of confidence in our election process, we add to the growing list of key early warning indicators of conflict. Our country has already checked all the boxes on the instability data analysis scale. Fraudulent elections is the death knell. Civil unrest - or worse - is not far behind. The Democrats know it and they are fighting the “life or death” - “do or die” fight on these bills. Are the Republicans prepared for the fight? The clue to their unreadiness and un-seriousness was first seen when they ignored the major large scale attack surfaces in our election management systems. Even the major policy influencers wouldn’t touch the electronic ballot manipulation concern. This is just weird.
Rumors abound. Is there an outside force in play here? Is it the kingmakers? The RNC? The Deep State?
Well, it doesn’t really matter who it is. It only matters what we are going to do about it. The ball is in our court. It’s their mess, but it’s our job to clean it up - or better yet, clean them out. But I’m getting ahead of myself.
Let’s get back to the particular bills. SB7 was the stronger of the 2 omnibus bills, but HB6 language completely replaced SB7 language. The Senate did not agree to this committee substitution and called for a conference committee made up of 7 Rs and 3 Ds. They have only a few days left to get the stronger language back in place. We are waiting.
There are other bills we are watching, but some died with Jeff Leach’s stunt and others are hanging on by a thread.
If we don’t get computers out of the election process, then our legislators will have failed us. We will lose Texas, and who knows what will happen to our Republic. I’m not optimistic that our legislators will come through, so here’s what we must do:
Before it is taken down, click on linktr.ee to read 8 months of material that has been declassified by President Trump, some redacted, some not. You can also read other hard-to-find articles and videos that have been removed by Big Tech. Of special interest is the release of transcripts by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI). The US Intelligence Community (IC) made appropriate redactions. Read about Alexander Nix Andrew McCabe, James Clapper, Jared Kushner, Loretta Lynch, Sally Yates, just to name a few. Who are these people and what have they done to screw the American people? Read the CIA UFO collection and draw your own conclusions. Two US Senate Committees report shocking details about Hunter Biden, Burisma and the sordid corruption that took place in Ukraine. The vastness of their dastardly deeds is breathtaking. You will find a treasure trove of important uncensored information that will help you better understand your brave new world.
“It’s Been Debunked” is a Lie!
If you believe that election fraud evidence has been debunked, then prove it. Show me your debunking evidence. Here are some claims that you can start trying to debunk:
15,000 events with 10,000 errors, just on one vote tabulator in one county - is that an acceptable error rate on your tabulator?
68% error messages resulting in 68% of the ballots going to adjudication (where someone else, not the voter, decides how the ballot should be voted) - is that normal?
Adjudication logs from that 68% adjudication batch are missing - this has never happened before the 2020 election.
Security logs from that 68% adjudication batch are missing - so no one knows who accessed the adjudication logs - is that ok?
Dominion CEO says their equipment does not use algorithms for vote tabulation, but Chapter 11 of the Dominion User Manual explains how to do it.
Passwords for voting tabulators & other equipment have been on the internet since 2012, unchanged.
Votes are stored on server in Frankfort, Germany. Why do we not keep our own votes here in the US? That’s just weird.
Malware harvests login and password credentials from your counties’ vote tabulators when they upload their votes to Frankfort servers.
No true hand count of real ballots has been done. Subpoenas have been ignored.
Former President of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, created Smartmatic software; the majority of US voting systems use Smartmatic.
China has complete access to every aspect of our election system.
Nevada SOS sent ISI Pakistan the US Voter Rolls.
We have the exact time and date of vote packets that were sent over the internet with changed votes, as well as, where the packets came from and the ID of the actual election equipment that the packets went to. Declassifying Hammer & Scorecard will show the missing piece of the actual real time packet flows. Removing the gag order on Dennis Montgomery will allow him to explain it in vivid detail to us. He’s already written a sworn affidavit. He’s in hiding; wonder why.
No one wants to investigate who US election fraud is connected to Italy. Why not? We gave over $30M to Muller to investigate Russia collusion on less evidence than what we have from Italy.
We have evidence of faster vote dumps than the actual equipment can scan. These vote dumps were done in the dark of night. (I was born at night, but it wasn’t last night!)
Dominion User Manual explains Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOT), which gives certain candidates more weighted value than others. Serbian software programmers gave us this snot, I mean SMOT. The weighted value could be based on gender, ethnicity, or Party registration. It’s also called Rank Choice Voting (RCV), it’s observed in the log, and determined by a tabulation algorithmic formula. It is sometimes called fractional voting. Is this the one vote for one person election that we thought we were getting? Who gets to decide on the algorithms? Originally, someone thought this would be a good idea for simplifying run-off elections.
Why are Trump’s key advisors (Cippalone, Meadows, others) telling him to concede and not to investigate election fraud. Why are they preventing him from declassifying Hammer and Scorecard? Why does no one is DC want to investigate fraud? Why don’t we have good answers to those questions?
Saying the evidence has been debunked is a statement that has yet to be proven. Who did the debunking? Where is their debunking evidence? Why haven’t they presented enough debunking evidence to convince 50% of the population that our elections really are honest? Why? Because they have made a claim, but they haven’t made their case.
America Can We Talk is a show with a mission — to speak up for the extraordinary and unique greatness of America. I talk about the top issues of the day facing America, often with insightful guests, always from the perspective of furthering that mission, and with the goal to inspire listeners to celebrate and embrace the liberty on which America was founded.
America, Can We Talk? for January 12th, 2021
Proof Positive: Coordinated Cyberwarfare Attack Against US By China, Russia, Iran, Iraq, Pakistan To Steal Election FromTrump
ORIGINAL ARTICLE BANNED - theamericanreport.org has been 'suspended.' by Web.com.
Download the PDF before it's removed here!
By Mary Fanning and Alan Jones | January 3, 2021
HAMMER INFO: https://www.blxware.org/
SCORECARD INFO: https://www.blxware.org/scorecard/index.html
President Trump has the authority, and so too the responsibility, to lift a pair of years-old federal gag orders known as the State Secrets Privilege and Government Protective Order that are preventing CIA contractor-turned-whistleblower Dennis Montgomery from revealing the truth about an illegal domestic surveillance program known as THE HAMMER and one of THE HAMMER’s applications, an election theft cyberwarfare weapon known as SCORECARD.
Montgomery presents a compelling case of fraudulent voting in battleground states. Montgomery’s analysis clearly demonstrates the coordinated involvement of China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, Iraq, and Pakistan, with specific data points such as source locations, dates, and times. Montgomery’s programs were built under contracts with the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the U.S. Air Force, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, among others.
THE HAMMER had been a tool for foreign surveillance until February 2009, at which time Brennan and Clapper commandeered it and turned it againstAmerica by transforming THE HAMMER into an illegal domestic surveillance tool. Fourth Amendment violations happened under Brennan and Clapper on a massive scale, under the Obama-Biden administration.
The Obama-Biden Administration, with Brennan and Clapper, took THE HAMMER with them when they left office. They stole the keys to the kingdom. Montgomery revealed that there is not just one HAMMER in the United States, but now, also a second HAMMER in the United Kingdom, and also, a third HAMMER in China. How that happened is a mystery.
Video shows a clearly coordinated cyberwarfare attack by foreign adversaries to steal the 2020 election from the American people and President Trump. It is worth noting that foreign adversaries wanted to place their preferred candidates Joe Biden and Kamala Harris in the White House, negating the American people’s vote.
Montgomery did not provide to the United Kingdom or China THE HAMMER or the source code for SCORECARD. The FBI, the DOJ, and the CIA did have the source code for SCORECARD. The last person to require the source code for SCORECARD was FBI Director James Comey, under the Obama-Biden Administration. The SCORECARD source code was a requirement by FBI Director Comey under Montgomery’s two 2015 immunity agreements.
THE HAMMER and SCORECARD were used to steal the 2020 election from President Trump on behalf of Joe Biden, according to Montgomery and Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia, a cyber security expert who has spent decades working for the Defense Department and U.S. Intelligence Community agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and the Department of Homeland Security.
Lt. General Michael Flynn (U.S. Army Ret.), the former Defense Intelligence Agency director who became President Trump’s first National Security Advisor, agreed with Dr. Keshavarz-Nia’s assessment that HAMMER and SCORECARD were used to steal the election from President Trump and transfer Trump votes to Joe Biden.
The New York Times, in a September 9, 2020 profile about a fake CIA officer titled “How One Man Conned The Beltway,” gave high praise to Dr. Keshavarz-Nia’s reputation for providing unmatched cybersecurity expertise to members of the U.S. Intelligence Community over the span of decades: Navid Keshavarz-Nia, those who worked with him said, “was always the smartest person in the room.” In doing cybersecurity and technical counterintelligence work for the C.I.A., N.S.A. and F.B.I., he had spent decades connecting top-secret dots.
The State Secrets Privilege and Government Protective Order invoked against Montgomery are being used as a cudgel to hide the Deep State’s repeated seditious coup attempts against President Trump and to carry out the ongoing election theft operations.
This was not just the theft of an election, this was the very theft of America herself.
If the theft of this landslide election for President Trump is successful, there will never be another fair election in America. The lights will have gone out on freedom, and Americans’ constitutional rights will be but a distant memory.
The Obama-Biden Administration intelligence chiefs James Clapper and John Brennan illegally commandeered THE HAMMER in February 2009. They utilized the illegally-harvested surveillance data they collected with THE HAMMER in order to carry out a blackmail and leverage operation inside the United States of America against President Obama’s political enemies, in support of President Obama’s ultimate goal of transforming America into a
communist client state. President Trump, under the powers accorded to him as Commander-in-Chief and protector of the U.S. Constitution, has the duty to declassify documents that prove that THE HAMMER and SCORECARD, cyberwarfare tools originally designed and built to keep America safe, were not only being utilized to stage multiple coups against President Trump and the United States, but also to usurp, on behalf of domestic traitors and foreign adversaries, the
American citizens’ right to vote in U.S. elections.
The American people’s sacred right to vote was paid for with American blood and treasure.
It is imperative that President Trump declassify this information because should the coup plotters get away with these acts of treason and sedition, there will never be another valid U.S. election. America will be lost. The President must exercise his full powers in discharging his duties in answering this Act of War.
While the Founding Fathers could not have envisaged cyberwarfare, this attack on America was no less an invasion than if foreign troops had invaded our shores.
THE HAMMER and SCORECARD were used to steal the 2012 presidential election on behalf of Obama and Biden. And now again, eight years later, the 2020 election has been stolen with THE HAMMER and SCORECARD on behalf of Biden and Harris, according to Montgomery and Dr. Navid Keshavarz-Nia.
The illegal domestic spying operation, conducted by rogue U.S. intelligence community officials utilizing THE HAMMER surveillance supercomputer, harvested terabytes of surveillance data. The Obama-Biden Administration subsequently used that illegally-harvested surveillance data to carry out ‘blackmail and leverage’ operations against American citizens, including other U.S. government officials, U.S. Supreme Court Justices, 156 Article III Judges, FISA Court Judges, Members of Congress, military officers, defense contractors, business leaders, law firms, and millions of Americans, according to The Whistleblower Tapes.
Multiple U.S. military intelligence sources confirmed to The American Report that THE HAMMER, designed and built by Dennis Montgomery in 2003 as a foreign surveillance tool, worked and protected the lives of Americans at home and U.S. troops serving in overseas theaters of operation. However, things went terribly wrong when America’s premier surveillance and cyberwarfare tools were commandeered by Obama-Biden Administration intelligence officials John Brennan and James Clapper and illegally unleashed against the American people.
Montgomery was prohibited from speaking to the American people about the super surveillance program that he built for the Defense Department in an effort to keep America safe from terrorists and other foreign adversaries in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, after the Government Protective Order and the State Secrets Privilege — basically a government gag order — were invoked.
Montgomery became a whistleblower after witnessing America’s premier spy tools being turned against the American people and being used to illegally change the outcomes of U.S. elections. The CIA’s charter clearly prohibits the agency from spying on Americans on U.S. soil.
Montgomery stated that he took an oath to preserve and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, both foreign and domestic.
Approximately 4,800 days ago, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence (DNI), a position held at that time by John Negroponte, invoked the State Secrets Privilege against Dennis Montgomery. According to the federal government, the DNI is “subject to the authority, direction, and control of the President of the United States.”
Did you know that China donated over $680+ million to 70+ college campuses and has been caught stealing American technological, scientific and military research?
Did you know that universities have not reported $4+ billion foreign government funding, of which $1.59 billion come from nations hostile to the US?
Why did Qatar file suit to ensure that its connections to universities were not fully disclosed?
A brand new must-see documentary, Covert Cash: What US Universities Don't Want You to Know About Their Foreign Funding, seeks to blow this subject wide open and drive awareness of the corruption and lack of transparency on campuses across America - those who allow foreign governments to gain influence and a nefarious foothold in the United States.
Based on exclusive reporting, the film exposes the millions of unreported funds flowing into today’s elite campuses from some of the world's worst actors including China, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Russia.
As the fear of foreign meddling shadows the 2020 election, the student debt crisis looms over America's future generation and colleges charge full tuition for glorified zoom sessions, America needs to know what kind of influence is being bought by these countries on our children's and our country’s future.
For More information, email email@example.com.
American Liberty Forum invites you to join Debbie Georgatos with America, Can We Talk? at their all day conference with an all star cast. Read below:
Our Message: All Lives Matter, Especially The Unborn
If Black Lives Mattered, You’d Protest at Abortion Clinics
While we abhor the unlawful murder of George Floyd, we want to call out the hypocrisy that some black lives matter more than others. Remember retired police officer David Dorn?
June 12th, Friday, 2:00pm - 6:00pm Lakeside Park
4601 Lakeside Drive, Dallas 75205
Bring Another View to the Highland Park March for George Floyd & Black Lives Matter. We believe all lives matter.
From Their Flyer:
“Come join us in unity for the unlawful brutal murder of brother George Floyd. No senseless violence will be tolerated. Food & drinks will be provided.
June 12th, Friday, 2:00pm - 6:00pm Lakeside Park
4601 Lakeside Drive, Highland Park TX 75205"
What to expect:
Gather at the corner of Lakeside Drive and Beverly Drive and march south to Armstrong Parkway. If it’s like the protest that I attended with Pastor Stephen Broden in University Park last Saturday, you will see lots of signs that say, “We Support Black Lives”, “Black Lives Matter”, “Open Your $$/Purse”, “Check Your White Privilege”, and “Defund the Police”. Like the march on last Saturday, you may be asked to kneel for George Floyd; Pastor Broden and I did not kneel then, nor will we kneel on Friday. We only kneel for Jesus Christ and we stand for black babies.
American Liberty Forum supports free speech, but not without limits. We support diversity of thought, but not without civility. We support competing ideas so the best ideas rise to the surface. Listen to others and make your voices heard in a way that they can listen to you. Question everything, Do your own research. Beware of hidden assumptions, half truths, and outliers. Remember: hard cases make bad law.
Bring your signs to show support for all lives, especially the unborn and police officers. Share the gospel; use words only when necessary. Email me if you have questions.
They had around 400 at the Saturday protest/march in University Park. We had 2. Wonder how many we can muster this Friday? Let me know if you can join us.
Many websites now have a slogan on their home page stating that “Black Lives Matter.’’ Of course black lives matter; yet, don’t white lives, red lives, yellow lives, and blue lives matter too? By blue lives, I mean our men and women dressed in blue fighting to protect our cities. Why should black lives matter more than white lives, red lives, yellow lives, and blue lives? Don’t all lives matter? Aren’t all lives equally valuable? Don’t we want to live in a society where no one sees skin color? Don’t we want to live in a society where no one mentions skin color because the color of your skin shouldn’t matter? (Even though the woke folk tell us that colorblindness is a bad thing now - it didn’t used to be.)
The progressive leftists talk a lot about how racist the right-wing conservatives are, but what do they really mean when they call someone a racist?? You will find that their definition of racism basically means racially prejudiced or discriminatory; yet, they are the ones who point out skin color, not the conservatives. In a society where true equality exists, skin color wouldn’t matter because equality has nothing to do with skin color, hair color, or even ethnicity. Yet, as long as the progressives keep talking about skin color and racism, it will continue to be an issue. Oh wait, maybe they want it to be an issue.
Lest anyone misunderstand my point, I do acknowledge that racist people exist. They always have; they always will. Unfortunately, there will always be white people who hate black people because of their skin color. There will always be black people who hate white people because of their skin color. However, the vast majority of people in America are not racists anymore than most Americans are hate filled rioters and looters.
So should black lives matter more than yellow, red, white, or blue lives? I believe all lives matter, but the tide is turning faster than you can imagine and we are being told to accept that some lives matter more than others. Or as the commandant at the end of the book, Animal Farm, said “all animals are equal but some animals are more equal than others.”
I want to start with a little demonstration that some of you may have seen at the Rally in Frisco on Tuesday (Select someone, show hypodermic)
Now, I’ve got a hypodermic needle here, and The question I have for you today is: “do I, as an individual, have the authority to plunge this needle into this man’s arm?” NO!!
Well, if I AS AN INDIVIDUAL don’t have the authority to plunge this needle into this man’s arm, can I elect someone to public office and give them the authority to plunge this needle into this man’s arm? OR ANY NEEDLE INTO ANYONE’S ARM? NO!!
SO THE QUESTION IS: WHY CANNOT I NOT DO THAT? Why Can I NOT elect someone to public office and give them the authority to plunge any needle into anybody’s arm?
The answer is THIS: I CANNOT GIVE WHAT I DO NOT POSSESS!
If I, AS AN INDIVIDUAL, do NOT possess the authority to plunge this needle into this man’s arm, I CANNOT elect someone to public office and give them the authority to plunge any needle into anybody’s arm! I CANNOT GIVE WHAT I DO NOT POSSESS!
Can I elect Senator Bob Hall, whom we love, and delegate to him the authority to give someone else the authority to plunge a needle into anyone’s arm? NO! Can I elect Judge Clay Jenkins or Governor Abbott and give them the authority to give to someone else the authority to plunge a needle into anyone’s arm? NO!
This is a hard truth, but not even in a time of crisis, be it real or perceived or manufactured, can I delegate an authority that I do not have as an individual!!! When AG Bill Barr said, “the Constitution is not suspended in times of crisis”, he was saying that our God given rights are not suspended in times of crisis!
But wait! What happened to let the law of legitimate, delegated authority get turned on its head? …… I’ll tell you what happened……
Under the spells of fear and panic, we naively allowed our governing bodies to create, by fiat, these so called Emergency Powers Acts at multiple levels of government, giving the autocrats in DC, Austin, and Dallas County unlimited, unchecked, unconstitutional, unimaginable powers to stick it to us whenever and however they please. The Emergency Powers Acts must be stopped.
Clay Jenkins, Governor Abbott, and all the unelected bureaucrats and Strike Forces do not have legitimately delegated authority to make me close my business, mask my face, stop singing, take a vaccine , place a chip in me, put a tattoo on me, or even sign up for a contact tracing app.
And how do I know this? I know this because the Bible tells me so. Authority comes from God and God alone! And when it comes to the ideas about authority, let me tell you this:
There’s only 2 ideas in the world -. God’s and everybody else’s. And when the 2 disagree, everybody else is wrong!
And just what does God say? He says: I have the God-given right to my life, my health, and my body. (Not a baby’s body inside of me, but my body.)
So, If I can’t do something to you as an individual, then I cannot elect someone to public office and give them the power to do that something either.
SO I WANT YOU TO TELL CLAY JENKINS AND GOVERNOR ABBOTT AND HIS STRIKE FORCE THIS:
On Trump Firing the Inspectors General, it is true that Inspectors General (IGs) serve at the pleasure of the President, but in addition, I think there are powerful and right reasons clearly available for his actions in two of these cases, and no particular reason to view the other decision with suspicion.
IGs of course are supposed to just “follow the law” and just “call balls and strikes” but as any sports fan knows, there are mountains of close calls and the decision of what and when to call things can be driven by bias. Slight missteps can be called out and exaggerated, or ignored entirely, based on bias. And all of these IG slots will be re-filled. If Obama was free to fill them with leftists, Trump can fill them with people more committed to the conservative worldview.
As to the removal of the State Dept IG, Steve Linick, there is an impending investigation of Secretary Pompeo about misuse of a political appointee for personal favors, and an older charge that some high level staffers are questioned about the political nature of their decisions and actions.
Given what we know about the Obama era track record of staffing high level positions in government with leftists who continue their leftist agenda regardless of who is president, the questioning should be happening. Whoever the new IG will be can continue looking into the Pompeo allegations if inquiry is warranted, but trusting an Obama appointee IG is absurd … ESPECIALLY as Linick was the one who pretty much gave Hillary a pass on her home-brewed server despite the illegality and duplicity involved in that. Linick also did not express concern when America’s Ukrainian Ambassador Yovanovitch testified that she knew virtually nothing about Burisma despite that newly discovered/ released documents show that she did.
The removal of the Intelligence Community IG Michael Atkinson should surprise no one. THIS is a guy who changed the whistleblower rules to allow a hearsay whistleblower complaint that led to the farce of the impeachment effort, despite that the whistleblower had clearly and easily discoverable political motivations and connections that prompted him to file that complaint. Atkinson signed up for the “Get Trump” team and Trump does not have to keep a guy like that in a position to continue harassing him.
Trump also removed the Pentagon’s Acting IG Glenn Fine who was also involved with the panel of federal watchdogs overseeing implementation of the $2 trillion coronavirus law. There is a shuffling of IGs in place among several agencies, and they will all end up with an IG.
Whether one agrees with President Trump’s decisions or accepts the validity of the reasons given is driven in great degree by whether people understand that this President has been the victim of an ongoing effort to destroy, undermine and remove him from the very start, or whether they are under the impression that all of the attacks on him (Russia Collusion hoax, Ukrainian Impeachment falsely charging Trump with what Joe Biden actually did etc.) have been matters of good faith.
For those who see as I do that the President is up against a cascade of never-ending attacks, an entrenched ruling elite class that will never let him restore America, and never tolerate the idea of Making America Great Again, the only answer he has is to root out the leftists in agencies all over the government who are blocking his efforts to do what the voters elected him to do.
The idea of IG s who are “neutral” is a farce ... they hold tremendous power to impede, interpret, justify or ignore all sorts of decisions. We need IG s who are honest and trustworthy and understand and apply the law, but in this era of intense political hostility against everything Trump is trying to do, much of which undermines all that the Left has been trying to do for decades, there is every reason for the president to want to remove entrenched leftists who will continue undermining him.
Read more by Debbie Georgatos at americacanwetalk.org
In summary: As of May 1, 2020 Dallas County Covid19 Mortality Rate is .023%. Texas Mortality Rate is .034%. As of April 25th the United States' Mortality Rate is .11%. Click here for details: covid_19_statistics.pdf
CALL COMMISSIONER'S COURT ON MONDAY, MAY 4, 2020 BEFORE 4:00PM!
STOP ALLOWING EVERYONE TO VOTE BY MAIL!!!
JUST SAY "NO TO MAIL-IN BALLOTS FOR ALL"
STOP ELECTION FRAUD!!!
THIS IS HOW DEMOCRATS PLAN TO STEAL OUR ELECTIONS!!!
As if we don't have enough election fraud in Dallas County, Commissioner John Wiley Price has put forth a resolution now on the Agenda for Tuesday May 5, 2020 to allow ALL to vote by mail:
This resolution is the result of a lawsuit filed by the Texas Democrat Party. State District Judge Sulak in Travis County ruled that mail in ballots would be accepted for every person due to the coronavirus issue regardless of disability or age over 65. Harris County also jumped on the bandwagon and began plans to implement immediately. But Attorney General Ken Paxton immediately appealed this ruling so Judge Sulak's attempt to legislate from the bench is stayed and of no effect -- at this time.
Now is the time to contact your County Judge and County Commissioners to voice your vehement objection to this attempt at usurping the election laws of the State of Texas.
Sign up by Monday 4:00 p.m. to speak at Dallas County Commissioners Court meeting on Tuesday, May 4
You can write a Letter to the Editor of the Dallas Morning News
Republican Party of Texas
SREC Senate District 16
Clarion Project recently launched a new online video with the testimony of Frank Meeink. See it here.
Last week, Facebook once again rejected a Clarion Project film, in this case, the one listed in the above link. In the past, the accusations of not abiding by Facebook's rules have stopped important Clarion shorts such as testimonies from ISIS victims, exposing extremism and terror, and other videos challenging radical Islam.
Facebook outdid themselves by rejecting the story of Frank Meeink, a former neo-Nazi, now an anti-hate activist, by claiming, "This ad isn't running because it promotes crises or controversial political or social issues for commercial purposes."
Does Facebook want to hide the truth about the neo-Nazi movement? This video is neither exploitative nor has it been posted for commercial gain. How wrong could Facebook possibly be?
This video features Frank Meeink speaking about his own personal journey. He wants to educate the world about the evils of the neo-Nazi movement. Apparently, Facebook doesn't.
Facebook once again has failed to differentiate between real quality educational content and hate speech. As long as it continues to make these errors in judgment and rejects free speech for its own concoction of self-righteous political correctness, Clarion and other freedom loving organizations will find themselves struggling every day to be heard.
Clarion Project, after much hard work, was able to rectify this wrong. The only question to ask now is, "how many more films will Facebook censor?" If you can help Clarion Project continue to show their films and trailers on Facebook, please let us know. We look forward to hearing from you. If you have a Facebook account, and you think this is a good video, share it on your wall!
Primary Author: David Williams, MD, Revised 4/23 with updates to section regarding COVID-19 deaths and the addendum.
For the full article, please go to Coronavirus Truths website. You must arm yourself with facts. Forearmed is forewarned, lest you give up all of your God given rights for the illusion of a little bit of safety.
I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery. ~ Thomas Jefferson
In summary, quoting directly from the website above:
"Truth: Covid-19 is an actual medical disease that will lead to tragic deaths.
Lie: We don't know much about coronavirus.
Lie: Covid-19 is more infectious than influenza.
Lie Covid-19 is more dangerous than influenza.
Lie: The fact one doesn't know he or she has Covid-19 makes it more dangerous.
Truth: Covid-19 is more dangerous to the elderly and immunocompromised.
Truth: That doesn't really mean anything in and of itself because everything is more dangerous to those unfortunate individuals.
Truth: It is now almost impossible for anyone in the general public or general medical community to know the actual number of deaths from Covid-19 [because the testing and coding were completely botched, mishandled, and manipulated from the beginning.]
TRUTH: THE CURRENT POLICIES INSTITUTED BY OUR LOCAL, STATE, ADN NATIONAL GOVERNMENTS ARE CAUSING GREATER HEALTH PROBLEMS THAN THE VIRUS EVER WILL.
Truth: The media as a whole has grossly misrepresented this disease.
Opinion: The way in which the media has pushed fear nonstop amounts to psychological warfare against this country.
Truth: The media will continue to fight reopening of this country by stating "experts" predict a spike in deaths if we do so.
Truth: Not every country has shut down their economy, and none fo those countries have suffered [statistically] higher rates of death because they have kept their economy going.
Opinion: Medical organizations have failed this country.
Truth: China is involved, but not how you think.
Truth: The NBA cancelled their season voluntarily, with no external domestic pressures, and China is a hug market for them. [Hmmmm]
Truth: People are lazy, or they have an agenda. [Do your homework!]
Truth: Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is making a fortune, and he wants you to stay home.
Truth: Covid19 has been treated like a world-ender; it's not even remotely close.
Truth: Quarantine is a period or place of isolation in which people who have been exposed or infected with a contagious disease are place. [not healthy people]
Truth: This is not a medical crisis, but a political crisis.
TRUTH: NOTHING WILL CHANGE UNLESS IT IS DEMANDED."
THE NUMBERS DO NOT JUSTIFY THE SHUTDOWNS AND RESULTING ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVASTATION!!
Dallas County Population 2020 - 2,637,772 *
Total Tested in Dallas County by County HS and Private = 14,821 **
Total tested negative = 12,243**
Negative Rate = 0.826
Positive Test Rate = 0.1739
Total Estimated Infected within Dallas County = 458,709 (population * positive test rate)
COVID-19 Mortality Rate Dallas County (As of 4/26/20) = ( 82/458,709) * 100 = 0.0179%
* U.S. Census Bureau July 2018 Estimate
** Source Mayor Johnson eMail 4/26/20
Using the State Information:
Total Number Tested: 276,021
Current Number of Cases: 24,643
Positive Test Rate: 0.089
Texas Population: 28,701,845
Estimated Infected: 2,561,237
Mortality Rate: 648/2561237*100= 0.025%
The Wall Street Journal has an article entitled, "The Bearer of Good Coronavirus News" with the subtitle: "Stanford scientist John Ioannidis finds himself under attack for questioning the prevailing wisdom about lockdowns." The article was written by Allysia Finley on April 20, 2020 and updated on 4/24/20. Her twitter handle is @Allysia Finley. Unfortunately, due to copywriter laws, I cannot reprint the article here. The gist is:
About the Author:
Beth Biesel is the Editor of the americanlibertyforum.org "What's New" Blog
American Liberty Forum
© COPYRIGHT 2019. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
The content of this website reflects the Judeo-Christian Worldview.
If images or content have inadvertently been taken from another site without proper acknowledgements/credits, contact firstname.lastname@example.org.